ISSN: 1899-0967
Polish Journal of Radiology
Established by prof. Zygmunt Grudziński in 1926 Sun
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
1/2023
vol. 88
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Breast radiology
abstract:
Letter to the Editor

Opinion on “The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)”

Monika Bekiesińska-Figatowska
1

1.
Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
Pol J Radiol 2022; 87: e10-e11
Online publish date: 2023/01/09
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
PlumX metrics:

Dear Editor,

I read with great interest and joy the article in the last issue of Insights into Imaging: “The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)” [1]. I agree with every word and view of our specialty from all sides, and I wish that as many fellow radiologists and radiologists in spe as possible read it with understanding. This is extremely important for any radiologist who is struggling not to drown in a burnout syndrome. However, I see two problems that are not in this position paper of the European Society of Radiology:
1) it should reach out to the representatives of other specialties who use our “services” (i.e. virtually everyone);
2) there is no idea in it (and probably cannot be, as it is not a simple matter) of how – according to the law and all the rules – to make us co-decision makers about the way, time, and method of diagnosing our patients (or not imaging them if they have already been diagnosed and their disease or, worse, developmental variant does not require it [e.g. annual MRI follow-up of a pineal cyst that has a diameter of a few millimetres or of a non-ossifying fibroma] or if continued follow-up is of no use [e.g. annual MRI follow-up of degenerative disease of the spine in a patient who does not wish to have surgery or who no orthopaedist or neurosurgeon will operate on because of the severity of the disease]).
By writing the latter I mean both the welfare of our patients, i.e. the welfare of the patients referred to us for diagnostic tests, their welfare at the time of imaging and in the future, as well as the welfare of other patients who require financial outlays for treatment.
The tremendous development of imaging modalities has resulted in what the authors write about: “often-unsustainable demand for increasing numbers of studies”. These studies are, to put it mildly, not infrequently completely unnecessary and unwarranted. This has been my “hobby” for years [2], and although I constantly talk about it in lectures and conversations with colleagues (radiologists and representatives of other specialties, like Cato the Elder, an implacable enemy of Carthage, who ended all speeches in the Roman Senate with this sentence: Besides, I believe that Carthage should be destroyed), it is not enough.
There are not many countries in the world, or in Europe, where financial resources for health care are...


View full text...



Quick links
© 2023 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.