ISSN: 1899-0967
Polish Journal of Radiology
Established by prof. Zygmunt Grudziński in 1926 Sun
Current issue Archive About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank



2018
vol. 83
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Relationship between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica with classification of craniofacial skeleton

Farhad Sobuti, Sepideh Dadgar, Ali Seifi, Seyed Jaber Musavi, Hoora Hadian

© Pol J Radiol 2018; 83: 120-126
Online publish date: 2018/06/04
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Purpose
In orthodontics, it is essential to determine the craniofacial skeleton pattern (class I, II, III) for planning treatment. Sella turcica bridging that is seen on lateral cephalometric radiographs is considered as a normal finding. This study aimed to compare sella turcica bridging and its dimensions in patients with various craniofacial patterns.

Material and methods
A total of 105 lateral cephalometric radiographs (53 men and 52 women), aged 14–26 years, were randomly and equally assigned to three groups of class I, II, and III, respectively. The length, diameter, and depth of the sella turcica as well as sella turcica bridging were determined on radiographs. The chi-squared test was used for assessing the relationship between sella turcica bridging and craniofacial skeleton classification. ANOVA was used for assessing the relationship between the dimensions of the sella turcica and craniofacial skeleton classification. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for assessing the relationship between age and the dimensions of the sella turcica.

Results
The sella turcica had a normal shape in 64.76% of patients, whereas 35.33% of patients had sella turcica bridging. In total, 11.42% of patients belonged to class I, 34.28% to class II, and 66.62% to class III. The diameter of the sella turcica had a significant relationship with age; the diameter of the sella turcica increased with age (p < 0.001).

Conclusions
There is a significant relationship between craniofacial skeleton patterns and sella turcica bridging, i.e., the incidence of sella turcica bridging is higher in class III patients. The sella turcica had a greater diameter in older patients.

keywords:

cephalometry, radiography, dental, digital, sella turcica

references:
Hasan HA, Alam MK, Yusof A et al: Size and morphology of sella turcica in Malay populations: A 3D CT study. J Hard Tissue Biol 2016; 25: 313-320.
Cederberg R, Benson B, Nunn M, English J. Calcification of the interclinoid and petroclinoid ligaments of sella turcica: A radiographic study of the prevalence. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6: 227-232.
Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 457-463.
Skrzat J, Szewczyk R, Walocha J. The ossified interclinoid ligament. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2006; 65: 242-245.
Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 580-585.
Kantor ML, Norton LA. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 414-426.
Bavbek NC, Dincer M. Dimensions and morphologic variations of sella turcica in type 1 diabetic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145: 179-187.
Jones R, Faqir A, Millett D, et al. Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 714-718.
Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjćr I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 597-604.
Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjćr I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 69-74.
Alkofide EA. Sella turcica morphology and dimensions in cleft subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45: 647-653.
Marşan G, Öztaş E. Incidence of bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in Class I and III Turkish adult female patients. World J Orthod 2009; 10: 99-103.
Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 148-153.
Leonardi R, Farella M, Cobourne MT. An association between sella turcica bridging and dental transposition. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 461-465.
Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 437-441.
Kjćr I, Hjalgrim H, Russell BG. Cranial and hand skeleton in fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2001; 100: 156-161.
Choi WJ, Hwang EH, Lee SR. The study of shape and size of normal sella turcica in cephalometric radiographs. Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2001; 31: 43-49.
Moslemzadeh SH, Moghaddam N, Foroughi Moghaddam S, et al. Relationship Between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica and antro-posterior skeletal malocclusions in children. Iran J Orthodont 2016; 11: e5738.
Proffit W, Sarver D, Ackerman J. Orthodontic diagnosis: The problem-oriented approach. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Mosby, St. Louis 2013; 150-219.
Silverman FN. Roentgen standards fo-size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1957; 78: 451-460.
Kisling E. Cranial morphology in Down’s syndrome: A comparative roentgenencephalometric study in adult males. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1966.
Abdel-Kader HM. Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective cephalometric study. Aust Orthod J 2007; 23: 30-35.
Shah AM, Bashir U, Ilyas T. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, II and III in patients presenting at Islamic International Dental Hospital, Islamabad. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2011; 31: 104-110.
Preston CB. Pituitary fossa size and facial type. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 259-263.
Valizadeh S, Shahbeig S, Mohseni S, et al. Correlation of shape and size of sella turcica with the type of facial skeletal class in an Iranian group. Iran J Radiol 2015; 12: e16059.
Busch W. Die Morphologie der Sella turcica und ihre Beziehungen zur Hypophyse. Virchows Archiv 1951; 320: 437-458 [in German].
Müller F. Die bedeutung der sellabrücke für das auge. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1952; 120: 298-302 [in German].
Platzer W (ed.). Zur Anatomie der “Sellabrücke” und ihrer Beziehung zur A. carotis interna. RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York 1957 [in German].
 
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe