ISSN: 1899-0967
Polish Journal of Radiology
Established by prof. Zygmunt Grudziński in 1926 Sun
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2017
vol. 82
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Role of Contrast Enhancement and Corrected Attenuation Values of Renal Tumors in Predicting Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Subtypes: Protocol for a Triphasic Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (CT) Procedure

Ersen Ertekin
,
Akın Soner Amasyalı
,
Bulent Erol
,
Saim Acikgozoglu
,
Faruk Kucukdurmaz
,
Alaaddin Nayman
,
Haluk Erol

Pol J Radiol, 2017; 82: 384-391
Online publish date: 2018/02/02
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Background: To distinguish RCC subtypes based on contrast enhancement features of CT images.

Material/Methods: In total, 59 lesions from 57 patients were included. All patients underwent multi-slice CT imaging with a triphasic protocol, which included non-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and urographic phases. Contrast enhancement features of renal masses were evaluated in terms of CT attenuation values (AV) and differences in contrast density; the aorta or renal parenchyma were evaluated based on corrected or relative values.

Results: Clear cell RCC (ccRCC) showed more intense contrast enhancement than other RCC subtypes. When differentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes, a cut-off AV of 86–89 HU, aorta-based corrected AV of 89–95 HU and renal parenchyma-based corrected AV of 87-95 HU showed a diagnostic accuracy of 81–86%, 86–88% and 74–78%, respectively, in the corticomedullary phase. Furthermore, a cutoff of 2.42–2.72 for the relative contrast enhancement ratio, a cutoff of 2.59–2.74 for the aorta-based corrected relative contrast enhancement ratio and a cutoff of 2.63–2.76 for the renal parenchymabased attenuation ratio showed a diagnostic accuracy of 83–88%, 88–90% and 81%, respectively.

Conclusions: The most reliable parameters for differentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes are aortabased corrected AV and aorta-based corrected relative contrast enhancement values in the corticomedullary phase.
keywords:

Carcinoma, Renal Cell • Contrast Media • Multidetector Computed Tomography




Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.