ISSN: 1899-0967
Polish Journal of Radiology
Established by prof. Zygmunt Grudziński in 1926 Sun
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
2018
vol. 83
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

The advantages of a spine coil over a torso coil in magnetic resonance imaging examination of the sternoclavicular joints

Artur Stefan Kusak
,
Michał Tomasz Podgórski
,
Piotr Grzelak
,
Adam Kwapisz

© Pol J Radiol 2018; 83: e645-e649
Online publish date: 2018/12/31
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Purpose
There are two standard methods for an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the sternoclavicular joints: with loop coils and the patient in the prone position, or with torso coils with the patient in a supine position. In some centres these joints are examined with the spine coil in a patient laying prone. There are no reports on the advantages of this method. Our hypothesis is that despite different MRI systems, application of a spine coil will improve examination quality.

Material and methods
Twenty-one healthy volunteers (10 female, 11 male, mean age 25 years) were randomised into three groups and scanned using three different MRI scanners (1.5T: Siemens Avanto, Philips Ingenia, 3.0T: Philips Achieva). Each volunteer was examined twice: using a standard protocol with a torso coil and with a spine coil, in prone position. The two groups were compared with regard to the intensity of motion artefacts using the χ2 test, and to the signal-to-noise ratio with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results
Application of a spine coil resulted in a significant decrease in the number of motion artefacts in all three planes (axial: p = 0.0004; sagittal: p < 0.0001; coronal: p = 0.0054). Moreover, the signal-to-noise ratio was significantly increased with the application of a spine coil (28.6 ± 8.6 vs. 18.5 ± 7.3, respectively; p = 0.0002).

Conclusions
Application of a spine coil with the patient in a prone position is suitable for MRI evaluation of the sterno­clavicular joints. It allows a higher signal-to-noise ratio and a lower intensity of motion artefacts to be obtained compared to a torso coil.

keywords:

MRI, technique, protocol, sternoclavicular joints, torso coil, spine coil




Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe