ISSN: 1899-0967
Polish Journal of Radiology
Established by prof. Zygmunt Grudziński in 1926 Sun
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
1/2022
vol. 87
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Chest radiology
abstract:
Review paper

Update on the limited sensitivity of computed tomography relative to RT-PCR for COVID-19: a systematic review

Clarissa Martin
1
,
Nina Cheng
2
,
Bryant Chang
2
,
Namrata Arya
3
,
Michael Joseph Diaz
4
,
Keldon Lin
3
,
Muhammad Umair
5
,
Joseph Waller
2
,
Travis Henry
6

1.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
2.
Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA
3.
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
4.
University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
5.
Johns Hopkins Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
6.
Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, USA
© Pol J Radiol 2022; 87: e381-e391
Online publish date: 2022/07/12
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
The global and ongoing COVID-19 outbreak has compelled the need for timely and reliable methods of detection for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been widely accepted as a reference standard for COVID-19 diagnosis, several early studies have suggested the superior sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) in identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a previous systematic review, we stratified studies based on risk for bias to evaluate the true sensitivity of CT for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study revisits our prior analysis, incorporating more current data to assess the sensitivity of CT for COVID-19.

Material and methods
The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 2020, and 25 April 2021. Exclusion criteria included lack of specification regarding whether the study cohort was adult or paediatric, whether patients were symptomatic or asymptomatic, and not identifying the source of RT-PCR specimens. Ultimately, 62 studies were included for systematic review and were subsequently stratified by risk for bias using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment tool. Sensitivity data were extracted for random effects meta-analyses.

Results
The average sensitivity for COVID-19 reported by the high-risk-of-bias studies was 68% [CI: 58, 80; range: 38-96%] for RT-PCR and 91% [CI: 87, 96; range: 47-100%] for CT. The average sensitivity reported by the low-risk-of-bias studies was 84% [CI: 0.75, 0.94; range: 70-97%] for RT-PCR and 78% [CI: 71, 0.86; range: 44-92%] for CT.

Conclusions
On average, the high-risk-of bias studies underestimated the sensitivity of RT-PCR and overestimated the sensitivity of CT for COVID-19. Given the incorporation of recently published low-risk-of-bias articles, the sensitivities according to low-risk-of-bias studies for both RT-PCR and CT were higher than previously reported.

keywords:

RT-PCR, systematic review, CT, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, sensitivity




Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.