Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2023
vol. 88 Head and neck radiology
abstract:
Review paper
Diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography for apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Farida Abesi
1
,
Ali Golikani
2
1.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2.
Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
© Pol J Radiol 2023; 88: e597-e605
Online publish date: 2023/12/27
View full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in apical periodontitis (AP) prediction. This was done to address the contradictory results reported in the existing literature on this topic. Material and methods We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases for literature published from inception to 30 June 2023 without language restriction using appropriate keywords. We included studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy values of CBCT in AP detection among humans by comparing AP diagnosis with a control group without lesions. We pooled the diagnostic accuracy values using a random effects model and presented the estimates as percentage and 95% confidence interval (CI). The heterogeneity between the surveys was explored by I2 statistic. Results Out of 301 citations initially identified, a total of 8 eligible studies were finally included. According to the analyses, the overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) estimated for CBCT were 94.6% (95% CI: 90.2-97.1; I2 = 55.9%, p = 0.026), 91.2% (95% CI: 81.7-96.0; I2 = 81.6%, p < 0.001), 93.0% (95% CI: 87.4-96.2; I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.024), and 92.3% (95% CI: 82.3-96.8; I2 = 86.4%, p < 0.001), respectively. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of digital radiography were 61.0% (95% CI: 38.3-79.8; I2 = 94.4%, p < 0.001), 97.3% (95% CI: 85.6-99.5; I2 = 86.7%, p < 0.001), 98.3% (95% CI: 92.0-99.6; I2 = 74.4%, p = 0.002), and 41.6% (95% CI: 28.0-56.6; I2 = 89.5%, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions CBCT imaging has excellent diagnostic accuracy in AP prediction. Also, CBCT has better discriminant test performance for AP than digital radiography. keywords:
cone-beam computed tomography, radiography, apical periodontitis, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity |