
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2022
vol. 87 Musculoskeletal radiology
abstract:
Original paper
The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report
Shashank Raj
1
,
Mahesh Prakash
1
,
Ashu Rastogi
2
,
Anindita Sinha
1
,
Manavjit Singh Sandhu
1
1.
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
2.
Department of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
Pol J Radiol 2022; 87: e274-e280
Online publish date: 2022/05/23
View full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Purpose
To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Material and methods Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI0, SImax, SIrel, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups. Results Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI0, SImax, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (p-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SIrel. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI0 > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SImax had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; p-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10-3 had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO. Conclusions DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot’s arthropathy. keywords:
diffusion-weighted imaging, Charcot arthropathy, diabetic foot osteomyelitis, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI |