
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2022
vol. 87 Head and neck radiology
abstract:
Original paper
The role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography in the evaluation of salivary sialolithiasis: radiologic-endoscopic correlation
Omneya Gamaleldin
1
,
Emad A. Magdy
2
,
Hesham Zoheir
1
,
Gihan Mohamed Shehata
3
,
Nermeen Elsebaie
1
1.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
2.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
3.
Department of Medical Statistics and Biomedical Informatics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Egypt
© Pol J Radiol 2022; 87: e430-e437
Online publish date: 2022/08/05
View full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR sialography in salivary gland calculi in correlation with sialendoscopy. Material and methods In this prospective study, pre-therapeutic MRI was performed for patients with clinically suspected sialolithiasis. In addition, sialendoscopy with or without surgery was performed. The detectability, number, size, and location of calculi (distance of obstruction from the ostium and masseter line) and the condition of the main duct at MRI were reported. Agreement between the 2 readers was confirmed for all MRI findings. Data regarding the detectability, number, and size of calculi were correlated with endoscopy. Results There was excellent agreement between the 2 readers regarding the detection and number of calculi at MR sialography (κ = 1, p < 0.001). As regards MRI measurements, excellent interclass correlation was found between the 2 readers regarding size of calculi, distance of calculi from the ostium, and distance from the masseter line (κ = 0.98, 0.98, 0.97, respectively; p < 0.001). In correlation with sialendoscopy, MRI was false negative in 1 patient, and it missed 1 calculus in 3 patients with multiple calculi. There was no statistically significant difference between the size of calculi detected by MRI and true size of calculi retrieved by sialendoscopy. Conclusions MR sialography is an accurate modality for diagnosis of the presence, size, and location of sialolithiasis and offers accurate ductal mapping for sialendoscopists. keywords:
MR sialography, sialolithiasis, salivary gland, sialendoscopy |