HEAD AND NECK RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Ultrasonography is the primary diagnostic tool for evaluating thyroid nodules. The Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS) aims to standardise assessment and reduce fine-needle aspiration biopsies through risk stratification. This pilot study examined knowledge and utilisation of TIRADS among Polish physicians, their perception of the usefulness of TIRADS application and the extent of knowledge of individual nodule features included.

Material and methods:
An internet-based questionnaire about TIRADS use in clinical practice was sent out to Polish Ultrasound Society members. Information on the responder’s experience with thyroid ultrasound and knowledge and use of TIRADS was assessed and analysed.

Results:
Out of 159 physicians, 66.6% did not use TIRADS despite 43.4% being aware of its existence. EU-TIRADS was the most commonly adopted classification (50.9%). Participants who adopted TIRADS were younger (p = 0.047) and more likely to be radiologists (p < 0.01). TIRADS use was more prevalent in university clinical hospitals (p = 0.02), among physicians doing thyroid ultrasound as their primary professional activity (p < 0.01), those performing > 100 thyroid ultrasound examinations per year (p < 0.01) and those involved with thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (p < 0.01). The purposes of TIRADS adoption (p < 0.01) and included imaging features (p < 0.01) were more accurately recognized by TIRADS users.

Conclusions:
TIRADS utilization among Polish clinicians is limited, despite awareness of the classification’s existence. Knowledge of TIRADS components and the purpose of its application among users is satisfactory. Further training and TIRADS adoption should be encouraged, especially in the light of the recent EU-TIRADS-PL guidelines recom­mended by the Polish Scientific Societies.

 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick DS, Valcavi R, Hegedüs L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and EuropeanThyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract 2010; 16 Suppl 1: 1-43. DOI: 10.4158/10024.GL.
 
2.
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS): white paper of the ACR TIRADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: 587-595.
 
3.
Abou Shaar B, Meteb M, Awad El-Karim G, Almalki Y. Reducing the number of unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsies with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS). Cureus 2022; 14. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23118.
 
4.
Alshoabi SA, Binnuhaid AA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography versus fine-needle-aspiration cytology for predicting benign thyroid lesions. Pakistan J Med Sci 2019; 35: 630-635.
 
5.
Yang R, Zou X, Zeng H, Zhao Y, Ma X. Comparison of diagnostic performance of five different ultrasound TIRADS classification guidelines for thyroid nodules. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 598225. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598225.
 
6.
Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, Durante C, Ngu R, Leenhardt L, et al. European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 2017; 6: 225-237.
 
7.
Jarząb B, Dedecjus M, Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z, Bakuła-Zalewska E, Bałdys-Waligórska A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer in adult patients – recommendations of Polish Scientific Societies and the National Oncological Strategy. 2022 Update. Endokrynol Pol 2022; 73: 173-300.
 
8.
Mauri G, Gitto S, Cantisani V, Vallone G, Schiavone C, Papini E, Sconfienza LM. Use of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) in clinical practice: an Italian survey. Endocrine 2020; 68: 329-335.
 
9.
Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS. Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q 2002; 80: 569-593.
 
10.
Geerligs L, Rankin NM, Shepherd HL, Butow P. Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 36. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0726-9.
 
11.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Produkt krajowy brutto rachunki regionalne w latach 2015-2017. GUS 2017; 62-68.
 
12.
Solymosi T, Hegedus L, Bonnema SJ, Frasoldati A, Jambor L, Karanyi Z, et al. Considerable interobserver variation calls for unambiguous definitions of thyroid nodule ultrasound characteristics. Eur Thyroid J 2023; 12: e220134. DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-22-0134.
 
13.
Sinsky CA, Bavafa H, Roberts RG, Beasley JW. Standardization vs customization: finding the right balance. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19: 171-177.
 
14.
Kim DH, Chung SR, Choi SH, Kim KW. Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 5611-5624.
 
15.
Jarząb B, Dedecjus M, Słowińska-Klencka D, Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z, Anielski R, et al. Rekomendacje Polskich Towarzystw Naukowych „Diagnostyka i leczenie raka tarczycy”. Aktualizacja na rok 2018. Endokrynol Pol 2018; 69: 34-74.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top