MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
Proposed modified classification system of the Munich Consensus Statement. Can the area of haemorrhagic effusion in muscle injuries be the dividing line between mild (3A) and moderate (3B) injuries?
1
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Insubria University, Varese, Medical Clinical Institute Intermedica – Columbus, Milano, Italy
2
Department of Radiology, ASST-Settelaghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
3
Department of Sport Medicine, Milan Lab, Milano, Italy
4
Department of Radiology Department, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
5
Graduate School of Radiology, Milano University, Italy
6
Medical Clinical Institute Intermedica – Columbus, Milano, Italy
Submission date: 2024-11-24
Acceptance date: 2025-04-13
Publication date: 2025-07-11
Corresponding author
Eugenio Annibale Genovese
Medicine and Surgery Department, Insubria University, Varese, Medical Clinical Institute Intermedica – Columbus, Milano, Italy
Medicine and Surgery Department, Insubria University, Varese, Medical Clinical Institute Intermedica – Columbus, Milano, Italy
Pol J Radiol, 2025; 90: 347-355
KEYWORDS
muscle injuries classificationathletesMRIRTPmuscle haemorrhagic collectionmuscle interstitial haemorrhage
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Muscle injuries are common in competitive sports. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) are the most commonly used methods for evaluating muscle injuries. Several classification systems for muscle injuries have been published. Mueller-Wohlfahrt et al. introduced a new classification system in 2013, currently the most widely used, employing grading to reflect the diverse spectrum of muscle injuries observed in athletes. The differentiation between lesions classified as type 3A (minor partial muscle tear) and 3B (moderate partial muscle tear) remains to be precisely established. In relation to recovery time, we researched possible statistically significant differences.
Material and methods:
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 100 MRI studies that were performed on high-level professional athletes who exhibited clinical signs of lower limb muscle injuries. We selected individuals whose myotendinous or myofascial lesions could be classified as 3A or 3B, based on the Mueller-Wohlfarth (MW) classification. The athletes were then categorised into groups based on the presence or absence of fluid collection at the site of injury. The study’s medical practitioner provided data regarding the duration of the injury and the return to sporting activities. Regarding statistical analyses, a linear regression test was conducted to examine the correlation between the variable “fluid collections” and the duration of the injury. Following this, Fisher’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney test was applied.
Results:
The results of the association between “blood collection” and “duration of injury” revealed a statistically significant correlation. The median value of return to play (RTP) in patients with haemorrhagic collection (median = 29) was significantly higher in comparison with patients without haemorrhagic collection (median = 19), with a difference between the 2 samples of 10 days.
Conclusions:
Our study highlights how this distinction could be easily practiced by recognizing the presence of a haemorrhagic collection and how it predominates in determining a worsening of the prognosis and therefore an extension of the RTP. Hence, we can conclude that athletes who do not have blood collection , but only interstitial haemorrhage between fibres can be considered as type 3A, while athletes with interstitial haemorrhage at diagnosis can be considered as type 3B.
Muscle injuries are common in competitive sports. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) are the most commonly used methods for evaluating muscle injuries. Several classification systems for muscle injuries have been published. Mueller-Wohlfahrt et al. introduced a new classification system in 2013, currently the most widely used, employing grading to reflect the diverse spectrum of muscle injuries observed in athletes. The differentiation between lesions classified as type 3A (minor partial muscle tear) and 3B (moderate partial muscle tear) remains to be precisely established. In relation to recovery time, we researched possible statistically significant differences.
Material and methods:
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 100 MRI studies that were performed on high-level professional athletes who exhibited clinical signs of lower limb muscle injuries. We selected individuals whose myotendinous or myofascial lesions could be classified as 3A or 3B, based on the Mueller-Wohlfarth (MW) classification. The athletes were then categorised into groups based on the presence or absence of fluid collection at the site of injury. The study’s medical practitioner provided data regarding the duration of the injury and the return to sporting activities. Regarding statistical analyses, a linear regression test was conducted to examine the correlation between the variable “fluid collections” and the duration of the injury. Following this, Fisher’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney test was applied.
Results:
The results of the association between “blood collection” and “duration of injury” revealed a statistically significant correlation. The median value of return to play (RTP) in patients with haemorrhagic collection (median = 29) was significantly higher in comparison with patients without haemorrhagic collection (median = 19), with a difference between the 2 samples of 10 days.
Conclusions:
Our study highlights how this distinction could be easily practiced by recognizing the presence of a haemorrhagic collection and how it predominates in determining a worsening of the prognosis and therefore an extension of the RTP. Hence, we can conclude that athletes who do not have blood collection , but only interstitial haemorrhage between fibres can be considered as type 3A, while athletes with interstitial haemorrhage at diagnosis can be considered as type 3B.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Pezzotta G, Querques G, Pecorelli A, Nani R, Sironi S. MRI detection of soleus muscle injuries in professional football players. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46: 1513-1520.
2.
Isern-Kebschull J, Mechó S, Pruna R, Kassarjian A, Valle X, Yanguas X, Alomar X, et al. Sports-related lower limb muscle injuries: pattern recognition approach and MRI review. Insights Imaging 2020; 11: 108. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00912-4.
3.
Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A. Acute first-time hamstring strains during high-speed running: a longitudinal study including clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 197-206. doi: 10.1177/0363546506294679.
4.
Calvi M, Curti M, Mazzoni S, Genesio L, Tavana R, Callegari L, Genovese EA. Paramagnetic contrast medium in high-level athletes with lower limb muscle injuries: can it make the return to sport safer reducing the recurrence rate? Radiol Med 2022; 127: 507-517.
5.
Ossola C, Curti M, Calvi M, Tack S, Mazzoni S, Genesio L, et al. Role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prognosis and classification of muscle injuries in professional football players: correlation between imaging and return to sport time. Radiol Med 2021; 126: 1460-1467.
6.
Siriwanarangsun P, Statum S, Biswas R, Bae WC, Chung CB. Ultrashort time to echo magnetic resonance techniques for the musculoskeletal system. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016; 6: 731-743.
7.
Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, Haensel L, Mithoefer K, Ekstrand J, English B, McNally S, et al. Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: the Munich consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 342-350.
8.
Fournier-Farley C, Lamontagne M, Gendron P, Gagnon DH. Determinants of return to play after the nonoperative management of hamstring injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 2166-2172.
9.
Slavotinek JP. Muscle injury: the role of imaging in prognostic assignment and monitoring of muscle repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14: 194-200.
10.
Nocerino EA, Aliprandi A, Tavana, Mazzoni S, Di Leo G, Genovese EA. Evaluation of muscle tears in professional athletes using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient: preliminary results. Acta Biomed 2019; 90: 238-244.
11.
Woods C, Hawkins RD, Maltby S, Hulse M, Thomas A, Hodson A; Football Association Medical Research Programme. The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football – analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 36-41.
12.
Grassi A, Quaglia A, Canata GL, Zaffagnini S. An update on the grading of muscle injuries: a narrative review from clinical to comprehensive systems. Joints 2016; 4: 39-46.
13.
Lempainen L, Mechó S, Valle X, Mazzoni S, Villalon J, Freschi M, et al. Management of anterior thigh injuries in soccer players: practical guide. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2022; 14: 41. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00428-y.
14.
Kerkhoffs GM, van Es N, Wieldraaijer T, Sierevelt IN, Ekstrand J, van Dijk CN. Diagnosis and prognosis of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 500-509.
16.
Genovese EA, Callegari L, Combi F, Leonardi A, Angeretti MG, Benazzo F, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound with second generation contrast agent for the follow-up of lower-extremity muscle-strain-repairing processes in professional athletes. Radiol Med 2007; 112: 740-750.
17.
Pollock N, James SLJ, Lee JC, Chakraverty R. British athletics muscle injury classification: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1347-1351.
18.
Valle X, Alentorn-Geli E, Tol JL, Hamilton B, Garrett WE Jr, Pruna R, et al. Muscle injuries in sports: a new evidence-informed and expert consensus-based classification with clinical application. Sport Med 2017; 47: 1241-1253.
19.
Chan O, Del Buono A, Best TM, Maffulli N. Acute muscle strain injuries: a proposed new classification system. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20: 2356-2362.
20.
Ernlund L, Vieira LA. Hamstring injuries: update article. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52: 373-382.
21.
Maffulli N, Oliva F, Frizziero A, Nanni G, Barazzuol M, Via AG, et al. ISMuLT guidelines for muscle injuries. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014; 3: 241-249.
22.
Hallén A, Ekstrand J. Return to play following muscle injuries in professional footballers. J Sports Sci 2014; 32: 1229-1236.
23.
Cohen SB, Towers JD, Zoga A, Irrgang JJ, Makda J, Deluca PF, Bradley JP. Hamstring injuries in professional football players: magnetic resonance imaging correlation with return to play. Sports Health 2011; 3: 423-430.
24.
Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Robinson P, Tol JL, Regatte RR, Crema MD. Imaging of muscle injuries in sports medicine: sports imaging series. Radiology 2017; 282: 646-663.
25.
Wangensteen A, Bahr R, Van Linschoten R, Almusa E, Whiteley R, Witvrouw E, Tol JL. MRI appearance does not change in the first 7 days after acute hamstring injury-a prospective study. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 1087-1092.
26.
Corazza A, Orlandi D, Baldari A, Gatto P, Stellatelli M, Mazzola C, et al. Thigh muscles injuries in professional soccer players: a one year longitudinal study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2013; 3: 331-336.
27.
Pedret C, Rodas G, Balius R, Capdevila L, Bossy M, Vernooij RW, Alomar X. Return to play after soleus muscle injuries. Orthop J Sport Med 2015; 3: 1-5.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
