HEAD AND NECK RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
Figure from article: Radiomics analysis of...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To develop and validate the value of different radiomics models based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) images for preoperative discrimination of parotid gland tumors (PGTs).

Material and methods:
A total of 158 patients with pathologically confirmed PGTs (123 benign and 35 malignant PGTs) were divided into training (n = 110) and test (n = 48) cohorts. A total of 963 radiomics features were extracted from DWI and DCE-MRI images. After dimensionality reduction and feature selection, three radiomics models based on DWI, DCE-MRI, and DWI + DCE-MRI were constructed by several machine learning algorithms. The optimal radiomics model was selected using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The performance of the models was evaluated using ROC curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to estimate the clinical values.

Results:
Logistic regression (LR) was selected as the optimal classifier for distinguishing benign and malignant PGTs. The radiomics model based on DWI + DCE-MRI achieved the highest AUC values in the training and test cohorts (AUC = 0.915 and 0.861), outperforming the DCE-only model (AUC = 0.903 and 0.847) and the DWI-only model (AUC = 0.839 and 0.769). The DCA based on the DWI + DCE-MRI radiomics model demonstrated high clinical usefulness.

Conclusions:
Radiomics is a useful tool for distinguishing malignant from benign PGTs. The radiomics predictive model that combines DWI and DCE-MRI yielded outstanding performance for improving clinical decision-making regarding the treatment of PGTs.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Thoeny HC. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Cancer Imaging 2007; 7: 52-62.
 
2.
Huang N, Chen Y, She D, Xing Z, Chen T, Cao D. Diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of parotid gland tumors. Eur Radiol 2022; 32: 2748-2759.
 
3.
Quer M, Vander Poorten V, Takes RP, Silver CE, Boedeker CC, de Bree R, et al. Surgical options in benign parotid tumors: a proposal for classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:3 825-3836.
 
4.
Gökçe E. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52: 11-32.
 
5.
Attyé A, Karkas A, Troprès I, Roustit M, Kastler A, Bettega G, et al. Parotid gland tumours: MR tractography to assess contact with the facial nerve. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 2233-2241.
 
6.
Partridge SC. Emerging techniques bring diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast into focus. Radiology 2020; 297: 313-315.
 
7.
Teo QQ, Thng CH, Koh TS, Ng QS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: applications in oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26: e9-e20.
 
8.
Zhu L, Zhang C, Hua Y, Yang J, Yu Q, Tao X, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in the diagnosis of lympho-associated benign and malignant lesions in the parotid gland. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150343.
 
9.
Yabuuchi H, Kamitani T, Sagiyama K, Yamasaki Y, Hida T, Matsuura Y, et al. Characterization of parotid gland tumors: added value of permeability MR imaging to DWI and DCE-MRI. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 6402-6412.
 
10.
Xu Z, Zheng S, Pan A, Cheng X, Gao M. A multiparametric analysis based on DCE-MRI to improve the accuracy of parotid tumor discrimination. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46: 2228-2234.
 
11.
Xu Z, Chen M, Zheng S, Chen S, Xiao J, Hu Z, et al. Differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumours: Application of SWI combined with DWI and DCE-MRI. Eur J Radiol 2022; 146: 110094.
 
12.
Stoia S, Lenghel M, Dinu C, Tamaș T, Bran S, Băciuț M, et al. The value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 1325.
 
13.
Mogen JL, Block KT, Bansal NK, Patrie JT, Mukherjee S, Zan E, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate parotid neoplasms using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40: 1029-1036.
 
14.
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 2016; 278: 563-577.
 
15.
Zheng YM, Li J, Liu S, Cui JF, Zhan JF, Pang J, et al. MRI-Based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 4042-4052.
 
16.
Tortora M, Gemini L, Scaravilli A, Ugga L, Ponsiglione A, Stanzione A, et al. Radiomics applications in head and neck tumor imaging: a narrative review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 1174.
 
17.
Qi J, Gao A, Ma X, Song Y, Zhao G, Bai J, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant parotid gland tumors using conventional MRI based on radiomics nomogram. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 937050.
 
18.
Muntean DD, Dudea SM, Băciuț M, Dinu C, Stoia S, Solomon C, et al. The role of an MRI-based radiomic signature in predicting malignancy of parotid gland tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 3319.
 
19.
He Z, Mao Y, Lu S, Tan L, Xiao J, Tan P, et al. Machine learning-based radiomics for histological classification of parotid tumors using morphological MRI: a comparative study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32: 8099-8110.
 
20.
Zheng Y, Zhou D, Liu H, Wen M. CT-based radiomics analysis of different machine learning models for differentiating benign and malignant parotid tumors. Eur Radiol 2022; 32: 6953-6964.
 
21.
Elhaie M, Koozari A, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D. Machine learning and neural network approaches for enhanced measuring and prediction of radiation doses. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2025; 18.
 
22.
Wang X, Wan Q, Chen H, Li Y, Li X. Classification of pulmonary lesion based on multiparametric MRI: utility of radiomics and comparison of machine learning methods. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 4595-4605.
 
23.
Rui W, Qiao N, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Aili A, Zhang Z, et al. Radiomics analysis allows for precise prediction of silent corticotroph adenoma among non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Eur Radiol 2022; 32: 1570-1578.
 
24.
Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Abe H, Schmidt RA, Newstead GM. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59:747-754.
 
25.
Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14: 749-762.
 
26.
Wang J, Hu Y, Zhou X, Bao S, Chen Y, Ge M, et al. A radiomics model based on DCE-MRI and DWI may improve the prediction of estimating IDH1 mutation and angiogenesis in gliomas. Eur J Radiol 2022; 147: 110141.
 
27.
Daimiel Naranjo I, Gibbs P, Reiner JS, Gullo RL, Sooknanan C, Thakur SB, et al. Radiomics and machine learning with multiparametric breast MRI for improved diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 919.
 
28.
Clauser P, Carbonaro LA, Pancot M, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, et al. Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 2830-2839.
 
29.
Gündüz E, Alçin Ö F, Kizilay A, Piazza C. Radiomics and deep learning approach to the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 30: 107-113.
 
30.
Lee JH, Yoon YC, Seo SW, Choi YL, Kim HS. Soft tissue sarcoma: DWI and DCE-MRI parameters correlate with Ki-67 labeling index. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 914-924.
 
31.
Luo Y, Sun X, Kong X, Tong X, Xi F, Mao Y, et al. A DWI-based radiomics-clinical machine learning model to preoperatively predict the futile recanalization after endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion patients. Eur J Radiol 2023; 161: 110731.
 
32.
Mo H, Liang W, Huang Z, Li X, Xiao X, Liu H, et al. Machine learning-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model for distinguishing central neurocytoma from glioma of lateral ventricle. Eur Radiol 2023; 33: 4259-4269.
 
33.
Bi Q, Wang Y, Deng Y, Liu Y, Pan Y, Song Y, et al. Different multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating stage IA endometrial cancer from benign endometrial lesions: a multicenter study. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 939930.
 
34.
Mao B, Ma J, Duan S, Xia Y, Tao Y, Zhang L. Preoperative classification of primary and metastatic liver cancer via machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 4576-4586.
 
35.
Kang JS, Lee C, Song W, Choo W, Lee S, Lee S, et al. Risk prediction for malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: logistic regression versus machine learning. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 20140.
 
36.
Han L, Yuan Y, Zheng S, Yang Y, Li J, Edgerton ME, et al. The Pan-Cancer analysis of pseudogene expression reveals biologically and clinically relevant tumour subtypes. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3963.
 
37.
Vabalas A, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, Casson AJ. Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0224365.
 
38.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015; 350: g7594.
 
39.
van der Ploeg T, Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 137.
 
ISSN:1899-0967
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top