TECHNOLOGY AND CONTRAST MEDIA / REVIEW PAPER
Scoping review of image-based overall survival prediction in glioma using machine learning
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2
Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4
Department of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-05-04
Final revision date: 2025-07-27
Acceptance date: 2025-08-27
Publication date: 2025-11-27
Corresponding author
Hassan Emami
Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pol J Radiol, 2025; 90: 571-581
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Accurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in glioma patients is crucial for optimising treatment decisions. Despite advancements in imaging and machine learning, challenges persist due to tumour heterogeneity and confounding factors. This scoping review systematically assesses state-of-the-art image-based OS prediction models for glioma, focusing on tumour characteristics, imaging modalities, preprocessing techniques, and machine learning methods.
Material and Methods:
This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, comprising five key stages: identifying the research question, searching for relevant literature, selecting studies, charting the data, and collating, summarising, and reporting the results.
Results:
The initial search identified 3238 records, of which 70 articles were included in the final analysis. Most studies originated from China, the United States, and India, with datasets averaging approximately 450 cases. To enhance predictive accuracy, various techniques were utilised, including image segmentation, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, and advanced feature extraction methods. Notably, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI and grade-specific glioma analyses improved model performance. Although deep learning models generally outperformed traditional methods, they required large, balanced datasets. Hybrid models showed promising potential; however, their performance was inconsistent due to challenges such as limited image quality and issues with model interpretability.
Conclusions:
Increasing sample size alone does not guarantee improved accuracy in glioma prediction models, because data quality and feature selection are critical factors. Incorporating diverse imaging modalities can significantly enhance predictive performance. To ensure greater clinical reliability in decision-making, integrating clinical features with imaging data is essential.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Luo C, Yang J, Liu Z, Jing D. Predicting the recurrence and overall survival of patients with glioma based on histopathological images using deep learning. Front Neurol 2023; 14: 1100933.
2.
Li Q, Du Z, Chen Z, Huang X, Li Q. Multiview deep forest for overall survival prediction in cancer. Comput Math Methods Med 2023; 2023: 7931321.
3.
Lobato-Delgado B, Priego-Torres B, Sanchez-Morillo D. Combining molecular, imaging, and clinical data analysis for predicting cancer prognosis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 3215.
4.
Whitfield BT, Huse JT. Classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas: Impact of the World Health Organization 2021 update. Brain Pathol 2022; 32: e13062.
5.
Cho HH, Park H. Classification of low-grade and high-grade glioma using multi-modal image radiomics features. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2017; 2017: 3081-3084.
6.
Bakas S, Reyes M, Jakab A, Bauer S, Rempfler M, Crimi A, et al. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge. arXiv 2018; arXiv 181102629.
7.
Agravat RR, Raval MS. A survey and analysis on automated glioma brain tumor segmentation and overall patient survival prediction. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2021; 28: 4117-4152.
8.
Poursaeed R, Mohammadzadeh M, Safaei AA. Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2024; 24: 1581.
9.
Zadeh Shirazi A, Fornaciari E, Bagherian NS, Ebert LM, Koszyca B, Gomez GA. DeepSurvNet: deep survival convolutional network for brain cancer survival rate classification based on histopathological images. Med Biol Eng Comput 2020; 58: 1031-1045.
10.
Mohammadpour S, Emami H, Rabiei R, Hosseini A, Moghaddasi H, Faeghi F, et al. Image analysis as tool for predicting colorectal cancer molecular alterations: a scoping review. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2025; 34: 10-25.
11.
Lu ZM, Guo SZ. Lossless Information Hiding in Images. Syngress; 2016.
12.
Zlochower A, Chow DS, Chang P, Khatri D, Boockvar JA, Filippi CG. Deep learning AI applications in the imaging of glioma. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 29: 115.
13.
Sadr H, Nazari M, Yousefzade-Chabok S, Emami H, Rabiei R, Ashraf A. Enhancing brain tumor classification in MRI images: a deep learning-based approach for accurate classification and diagnosis. Image Vis Comput 2025; 159:105555.
14.
Shen D, Wu G, Suk HI. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2017; 19: 221-248.
15.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Scoping Reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z (eds.). JBI 2024.
16.
Macyszyn L, Akbari H, Pisapia JM, Da X, Attiah M, Pigrish V, et al. Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18: 417-425.
17.
Yan J, Lin HH, Zhao D, Hu Y, Shao R. China’s new policy for healthcare cost-control based on global budget: a survey of 110 clinicians in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 84.
18.
Medical Imaging Market. Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Technology (X-ray Devices, Computed Tomography, Ultrasound, Nuclear Imaging). By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2024-2030. San Francisco, USA 2025. Available from:
https://www.grandviewresearch.....
20.
Zhong J, Liu X, Lu J, Yang J, Zhang G, Mao S, et al. Overlooked and underpowered: a meta-research addressing sample size in radiomics prediction models for binary outcomes. Eur Radiol 2025; 35: 1146-1156.
21.
Sohn CK, Bisdas S. Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based radiomics in grading gliomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2020; 2020: 2127062.
22.
Claus EB, Walsh KM, Wiencke JK, Molinaro AM, Wiemels JL, Schildkraut JM, et al. Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. Neurosurg Focus 2015; 38: E6.
23.
Haydar N, Alyousef K, Alanan U, Issa R, Baddour F, Al-Shehabi Z, et al. Role of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in grading gliomas comparable with pathology: a cross-sectional study from Syria. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 82: 104679.
24.
Horská A, Barker PB. Imaging of brain tumors: MR spectroscopy and metabolic imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2010; 20: 293-310.
25.
Hooper GW, Ansari S, Johnson JM, Ginat DT. Advances in the radiological evaluation of and theranostics for glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 4162.
26.
Pope WB, Brandal G. Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with high-grade glioma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 62: 239-253.
27.
Al Murdef HMH, Al Jumhur ASH, Hamim AMHB, Al Rashah MAS, Alzanati MMH, Mahdi N, et al. Comparison of CT and MRI for brain imaging. J Int Crisis Risk Commun Research 2024; 7: 337-351.
28.
Ibrahim R, Samian SD, Mazli M, Amrizal M, Aljunid SM. Cost of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scan in UKMMC. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 (Suppl. 1): P11.
29.
Shukla G, Alexander GS, Bakas S, Nikam R, Talekar K, Palmer JD, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma: a review. Chin Clin Oncol 2017; 6: 40.
30.
Zhou Z, Huang D, Bao J, Chen Q, Liu G, Chen Z, et al. A synergistically enhanced T(1)-T(2) dual-modal contrast agent. Adv Mater 2012; 24: 6223-6228.
31.
Minja FJ, Bhimani A, Wydra E. New techniques in MRI – fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and MRI-guided Laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) for brain lesions. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2016; 54: 94-108.
32.
Ahir BK, Engelhard HH, Lakka SS. Tumor development and angiogenesis in adult brain tumor: glioblastoma. Mol Neurobiol 2020; 57: 2461-2478.
33.
Sun L, Zhang S, Chen H, Luo L. Brain tumor segmentation and survival prediction using multimodal MRI scans with deep learning. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 810.
34.
Ramesh K, Kumar GK, Swapna K, Datta D, Rajest SS. A review of medical image segmentation algorithms. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol 2021; 7: e6.
35.
Cardenas CE, Yang J, Anderson BM, Court LE, Brock KB. Advances in auto-segmentation. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 29: 185-197.
36.
Liu TT, Achrol AS, Mitchell LA, Du WA, Loya JJ, Rodriguez SA, et al. Computational identification of tumor anatomic location associated with survival in 2 large cohorts of human primary glioblastomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 621-628.
37.
Xu C, Peng Y, Zhu W, Chen Z, Li J, Tan W, et al. An automated approach for predicting glioma grade and survival of LGG patients using CNN and radiomics. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 969907.
38.
Chato L, Latifi S. Machine learning and radiomic features to predict overall survival time for glioblastoma patients. J Pers Med 2021; 11: 1336.
39.
Kalaiselvi T, Selvi SK. Investigation of image processing techniques in MRI based medical image analysis methods and validation metrics for brain tumor. Curr Med Imaging 2018; 14: 489-505.
40.
Afshar P, Mohammadi A, Plataniotis KN, Oikonomou A, Benali H. From handcrafted to deep-learning-based cancer radiomics: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2019; 36: 132-160.
41.
Fu L, Ma J, Ren Y, Han YS, Zhao J (eds.). Automatic detection of lung nodules: false positive reduction using convolution neural networks and handcrafted features. Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; 2017: SPIE.
42.
Khan MKH, Guo W, Liu J, Dong F, Li Z, Patterson TA, et al. Machine learning and deep learning for brain tumor MRI image segmentation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2023; 248: 1974-1992.
43.
Salçin K. Detection and classification of brain tumours from MRI images using faster R-CNN. Tehnički glasnik 2019; 13: 337-342.
44.
Fu J, Singhrao K, Zhong X, Gao Y, Qi SX, Yang Y, et al. An automatic deep learning-based workflow for glioblastoma survival prediction using preoperative multimodal MR images: a feasibility study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6: 100746.
45.
Wang Y, Shao Q, Luo S, Fu R. Development of a nomograph integrating radiomics and deep features based on MRI to predict the prognosis of high grade Gliomas. Math Biosci Eng 2021; 18: 8084-8095.
46.
Zhao R, Krauze AV. Survival prediction in gliomas: current state and novel approaches. In: Gliomas. Debinski W (ed.). Brisbane (AU), Exon Publications 2021.
47.
Wiegrebe S, Kopper P, Sonabend R, Bischl B, Bender A. Deep learning for survival analysis: a review. Artif Intell Rev 2024; 57: 65.
48.
Wang P, Fan E, Wang P. Comparative analysis of image classification algorithms based on traditional machine learning and deep learning. Pattern Recognit Lett 2021; 141: 61-67.